Sous Vide Historical Note: Count Rumford

If you read the Sous Vide article at wikipedia, you will notice an uncited reference to Count Rumford discovering sous vide. Now, there are two banes to my existence, wikipedia and uncited references. Since wikipedia content is religiously stolen, aggregated and republished, Google becomes useless when trying to hunt down the minutia that keeps me going.

Fortunately, I managed to hunt down the essay written by Count Rumford. I should I say eſſay. Or ſhould I ſay eſſay? Because, apparently, as late as 1802 we were still using the long s. Which makes reading Count Rumford's ſeminal eſſay, "Of the imperfections of the Kitchen Fire-places now in common uſe" a real delight.

You people owe me.

This essay, which could be found in 1802's timeless classic Essays, political, economical, and philosophical, Volume 3 not only gives us valuable insight into the culinary happenings of the 1800's, but also gives us one of the earliest documented efforts of low temperature cooking.

The opening salvo reads much like an essay you would have read at the beginning of the modernist cuisine movement:
The advantage that would result from an application of the late brilliant discoveries in Philosophical Chemistry, and other branches of Natural Philosophy and Mechanics, to the improvement of the Art of Cookery, are so evident, and so very important, that I cannot help flattering myself that we shall soon see some enlightened and liberalminded person of the profession take up the matter in earnest, and give it a thoroughly scientific investigation.
Doesn't that sound a lot like the beginnings of modernism?

But let's get to the nut. The part we have all been waiting for. The earliest, bestest documented, sort-of accidental discovery of low temperature cookery.
I had long suspected that it could hardly be possible that precisely the temperature of 212 degrees of Fahrenheit's thermometer (that of boiling water) should be that which is best adapted for cooking all sorts of food; but it was the unexpected result of an experiment that I made with another view, which made' me particularly attentive to this subject.
Desirous of finding out whether it would be possible to roast meat in a machine I had contrived for drying potatoes, and fitted up in the kitchen of the House of Industry at Munich, I put a shoulder of mutton into it, and after attending to the experiment three hours, and finding it showed no signs of being done, I concluded that the heat was not sufficiently intense; and despairing of success, I went home, rather out of humour at my ill success, and abandoned my shoulder of mutton to the cook maids.
He didn't have the benefit of the Internet.  He wasn't able to email Douglas Baldwin, to ask him "What is the proper cooking time/temperature for the perfect shoulder of mutton?"

Also, 'rather out of humour' is a nineteenth century euphemism for 'ſo fucking piſſed'.

Basically, he stormed out of the kitchen saying, "I ain't cleaning this shit!"
It being late in the evening, and the cook maids thinking perhaps that the meat would be as safe in the drying machine as anywhere else, left it there all night.
The cook maids also said, "We ain't cleaning this shit!"
When they came in the morning to take it away, intending to cook it for their dinner, they were much surprised to find it already cooked, and not merely eatable, but perfectly done, and most singularly well-tasted. This appeared to them the more miraculous, as the fire under the machine was gone quite out before they left the kitchen in the evening to go to bed, and as they had locked up the kitchen when they left it, and taken away the key.
The next day, the cook maids sang, "This shit is delicious!"
This wonderful shoulder of mutton was immediately brought to me in triumph, and though I was at no great loss to account for what had happened, yet it certainly was quite unexpected ; and when I tasted the meat I was very much surprised indeed to find it very different, both in taste and flavour, from any I had ever tasted. It was perfectly tender; but though it was so much done, it did not appear to be in the least sodden or insipid; on the contrary, it was uncommonly savoury and high flavoured.
Rumford also proclaimed, "Thiſ ſhit is delicious!"

Then he continued...
It was neither boiled, nor roasted, nor baked. Its taste seemed to indicate the manner in which it had been prepared: that the gentle heat to which it had for so long a time been exposed, had by degrees loosened the cohesion of its fibres, and concocted its juices, without driving off their fine and more volatile parts, and without washing away or burning and rendering rancid and empyrumatic its oils.
Does this sound familiar? When I first read it, I was wondering if this was more like the one true barbecue, but the second half of the description really sounds closer to low temperature sous-vide style preparations.

Count Rumford has a couple of other notable accomplishments:
  1. The Convection Oven.
  2. Candle Power Measurement. Or at least the candle so consistent in its light level.
  3. The Modern Kitchen Range.
  4. A pressure cooker.
  5. A double boiler.
  6. The Rumford Fireplace.
  7. Rumford Baking Powder is named after him.
Less notable, but totally scandelicious ones:
  1. Marrying into a wealthy and influential family, which led to him being:
  2. Promoted to a Major. This, of course, made him incredibly unpopular with the folks he just lept over. So, that makes it all the more curious that:
  3. He was accused of being a British Loyalist, and was charged with crimes like “being unfriendly to the cause of liberty”. This seems to have been true, but I wonder if he was just "being apathetic to the cause of liberty" or "playing hard to get with the cause of liberty". Either way, he knew when he wasn't wanted, so he:
  4. Fled America during the British evacuation of 1776, without...
  5. His wife or daughter.
Finally, I am sure you are wondering, "Well, wait, how should I prepare a shoulder of mutton?"

I asked Douglas Baldwin that question.  Here is his response:
Hello Pablo,
I have lamb shoulder in my "Temperatures & Times" on page 28 and would increase the time by 25--50% since it's mutton.
First you have to decide if you want a medium-rare/medium muttonshoulder or if you want a braised-style mutton shoulder. If you want medium-rare (130F/55C) or medium (140F/60C) then I'd cook it at that temperature for 2--3 days (but it might be done in 1 day). I usually just feel the meat through the bag to decide if it's done yet. If you want a braised-style mutton shoulder, then I'd do either 160F/70C for 24--32 hrs or 175F/80C for 12--18 hrs.
Very best wishes,
Douglas
Eat your heart out, Rumford. 

KitchenAid's Chef Touch: Whirlpool's Foray Into Sous Vide Appliances

Jean-François, over at sousvidecooking.org, posted about KitchenAid's first foray into a sous vide solution: Chef's Touch.  As a casual observer of the consumer sous vide market, I am excited to see the one of the largest home appliance manufacturers dip a toe into the space.  So excited, that I scoured their website trying to absorb as much as possible.

QUICK RUNDOWN OF THE  KITCHENAID CHEF TOUCH

Image of the KitchenAid Chef Touch
Their website indicates that the Chef's Touch Solution is comprised of three parts:
  1. Chamber Vacuum.  The chamber vacuum will support bags and containers, both sold by KitchenAid.  The only bit of technical details I could glean form the website was: "the residual pressure inside the bag is just 5 mbar compared to the 350-500 mbar offered by other machines, ensuring an optimal vacuum that means your food will be preserved for longer compared to traditional refrigeration.".   While not explicit, reading between the lines makes me think you cannot control the amount of pressure, which may limit compression applications.  Either way, it's still pretty impressive that they are shipping a chamber vacuum for home kitchens. 
  2. Steam/Combi Oven.  The website indicates two oven models, one exclusively using steam and the other a combi oven, using hot air and steam.  Alas, they are somewhat vague on the technical details.  I would love to see how temperature stable this is.  My initial inclination is that it won't actually matter if it is less accurate than a water bath.  
  3. Blast Chiller.  The blast chiller is used if you want to utilize the cook/store benefits of sous vide.  It two modes, one for refrigerator ('blast chilling') storage and one for freezer ('fast freezing') storage. The blast chiller will bring which will bring food temperature down to 3ºC and -18ºC respectively.  This might be an overlooked component in current home appliances.  The consumer market currently doesn't offer any solution other than suggesting manual methods of rapidly cooling down items in ice water.  Even though it raises the price significantly, it will simultaneously remove some of the safety objections people have with sous vide, and differentiate itself from smaller appliances.
These three components are not cheap, so I suspect this will command top dollar and be geared towards the upper end of the consumer market. I am expecting the starting price to exceed $7,500 USD.  I won't be shocked if it enters the 5 digit range, but if I had to guess, I'd pick a $9,999 price tag for the entry level.  Admittedly, this is probably a pipe dream.

Either way, unless your house could appear on MTV cribs, you probably will not be buying one of these.  The first microwave ovens were also prohibitively expensive, and now you probably can't give your microwave away.

Whirlpool's earnings press release also indicates that this was launched from KitchenAid Europe:
Whirlpool Europe Region launched:

[...]


-- The KitchenAid brand Chef Touch cooking system for  home use, a  cooking system that previously was available only for commercial use by top-rated restaurants around the world.  The Chef Touch system features three different products: the vacuum-sealing system; the steam-assist oven; and the blast chiller.
Which means, Americans are currently out of luck.

RANDOM MARKET THOUGHTS FROM AN UNQUALIFIED JACKASS

This won't compete with Fresh Meals Magic's offerings, the SousVide Supreme or any of the consumer focused sous vide devices.  If anything, this will help the space grow and mature, especially if KitchenAid invests heavily in the marketing of the Chef Touch.  It isn't even all that likely that this will eat into the portion of PolyScience customers that would have bought a chamber vacuum and an immersion circulator.  This would be true even if the Chef Touch was available in markets besides Europe.

Long term, KitchenAid or anyone of its ilk getting into this game makes for some interesting challenges for the current players in the consumer market.  Obviously, KitchenAid (or Kenmore) can achieve scale easily and have a lot of money to market their products.  But also consider this, many home kitchens today are built with microwave ovens.  They are as aestetically pleasing as we expect and they generally match the other appliances.  Of course, for the world of sous vide, that's far from tomorrow.

Finally, please remember that I am an unqualified jackass, who specializes in armchair analytics and shit talking.  Although, I have heard from some people that I am, in fact, a fully-qualified jackass.

Would you buy one of these?  How much would YOU spend?

DIY PolyScience Form-Factor Smoke Guns Part II

In Part I of my guide to replicating the PolyScience Smoking Gun, we discussed the basics of the gun as well as previous DIY attempts.  In this segment, I will walk you through my process for making your own smoke gun with some very simple parts.

Even though this guide will produce a working smoke gun, in the end, you will not have a PolyScience Smoking Gun.  You will have something that looks similar to one, but most likely will not be as durable.  Even with some of the improvements I plan to make in the future, it is unlikely that this is as good as a PSG.

PolyScience specifically mentions details that makes me believe this device is different under the hood.  I am willing to bet that theirs will survive longer and get better results.  For example, they mention a "Heavy-duty metal blower fan".  Cursory examination did not reveal anything resembling sturdy construction.  That being said, you can't beat the price, and if you find yourself burning out the DIY ones, spend the money and get the real thing.  Finally, I have to assume they know more about food safety than I do.

Before we begin, I need to give the disclaimer.  You know, the one where I make no warranty that any of this is safe.  That applies to both the construction and use of said device.  If it explodes in your hand, not my problem.  If the plastics or the smoke gives you tumors, don't call me.  If it explodes and gives you tumors, don't call me... just email me some pics.  Please read the safety section at the bottom of this post.

Ok, let's get started.  First off, you are going to need:
  • A Syba battery powered vacuum
  • A pipe
  • Gorilla Tape
  • Coarse Sandpaper
  • 1' of Food Safe Vinyl Tubing (3/8" Internal Diameter) (pipe to vacuum)
  • 1' of Food Safe Vinyl Tubing (1/2" Internal Diameter) (vacuum to food)
  • 4 AA Batteries
Your best bet is to go to the hardware store and buy the 3/8" vinyl tube, and then go to a pipe store and keep shoving pipes into said tube until you find one that fits.   If your experience is anything like mine, you will spend 15 unconvincing minutes trying to convince a thoroughly disinterested shop keeper that your goal involves smoking scallops and not illicit drugs.  Finally, after said shopkeeper warns you not to smoke scallops, because it will just melt scallop goo into the pipe, and reiterates that this pipe is for tobacco use only, you will just shut up and buy the pipe.  Don't forget to buy screens.
Most Of Our Parts
The first step is to work around a manufacturing flaw with the Syba vacuum.  The fan blades protrude too far and touch the outer housing.  As a result, the fan won't spin.  That's where the coarse sandpaper comes in.  Sand down the fan blades as illustrated below.
The Syba Vacuum Sucks.
As you are sanding, every so often, put the outer case back on and test the vacuum.  As soon as the vacuum runs smoothly, you can stop sanding.  Now, clean the fan and make sure you don't have little plastic bits everywhere, as they are not delicious.  The next step is to cover the vents behind the fan blades with the Gorilla Tape.  While this won't be good for heat, it will be good for minimizing smoke loss.

Worst Hand Model Ever.

Now, jam the pipe into one end of the 3/8"tubing.  Delicately put the other side of the pipe into the input of the vacuum.

Mostly Constructed. Just Add Second Tube. 
The last step is to take the 1/2" tube and put it over the exhaust pipe (the long piece below the input).  Congratulations!  You now have a smoke gun.  SO far, I've used it to smoke some sous vide scallops and I also made some tomatillo husk smoked tomatillos.  My next version will:

1. Be more permanent.  Right now, its pretty fragile.  This also means that some of the smoke will exit the vacuum through some of the seams in the unit.
2. Replace the vinyl tubing with something safer for high heat.  I think this model is fine for light use, but  I wouldn't use it frequently or for high volumes.

AND NOW FOR SOME MORE WORDS ON SAFETY

This particular version is more of a proof of concept, and I would not recommend regular use.  This is primarily because of the the tubing.  Even though it is food safe, it probably not be safe at high temperatures and may degrade over time.  I don't think the risks are that great if you are using it judiciously.  I haven't kept mine on for more than 5-10 seconds.

This can be improved by replacing the vinyl tubing with food safe thermoplastic or possibly silicone tubing, which you can purchase from a home brew supply store.  This should be safer against high temperature uses (go for the highest temperature rating you can find).

The final concern is that the plastics in the vacuum might release toxins if exposed to higher temperatures.   This is also true of other DIY smoke guns as well.

Assuming you aren't using this regularly, you will likely be exposed to these same chemicals in higher quantities via other activities in your life.  Just. Be. Smart.

And, see the above disclaimer.

Also, smoke is a carcinogen too.  So avoid that too.

Life is a carcinogen.

So is the Internet.

So is this sentence.

Bananas.

DIY PolyScience Form-Factor Smoke Guns Part I

Smoke guns are culinary gadgets used to apply smoke to food.  Under the hood, these devices are basically handheld electric vacuums with a pipe attached to the input nozzle.  You turn on the vacuum, apply fire to the pipe, the vacuum pulls the fire into the pipe, setting the woodchips or herbs in the pipe on fire.  The smoke travels through the vacuum and out through the exhaust, and onto your dish.  They are far less cumbersome than stovetop smokers and are great if you just want to give smokiness to any dish.  While PolyScience sells one of these units for approximately $80, a lot of people made their own version.  Oh lookie, here comes one now:
Chadzilla's MINI-VAC Smoker.  Cite: www.chadzilla.com
These DIY models were based on the Mini-Vac vacuum, which you can buy off of Amazon for about $17.   This approach is pretty functional, and all said and done probably costs $25-30 to construct, not including your labor.

Alternatively, you can buy one of these pre-constructed at any full service smoke shop.  You know, where they sell "tobacco" equipment.  The mini-vac approach is great, but there are some shortcomings:
  1. They don't survive heavy use.  This has to do with the heat produced by the smoke as well as the amount of usage.  In other words, it won't last in a professional kitchen and may not even be able to survive heavy home use.  
  2. Which would be fine if it weren't for the fact that they are not THAT cheap.  At $25 a pop, you may spend more on DIY smokers than on just buying a PolyScience Smoking Gun.  
  3. As if that weren't enough... they. look. ghetto.  No really, your friends will definitely think you are doing drugs.  Without a doubt, the PolyScience one looks way slicker:
PolyScience Smoking Gun.  Cite: www.polyscience.com
I had seen an early version of the Smoking Gun that looked like it was put together with some off the shelf parts.  In fact, it looked like someone glued a pipe jammed into a vacuum.  After an hour of scouring the Internet, I found a Syba vacuum that looked pretty close:

Left: PolyScience Smoking Gun.  Right: Syba Vacuum.  Hrm.
Several clicks later and I had two Syba vacuums shipped to my lair.  Tune in next time and I will explain:
  1. How to construct a Syba based smoking gun.  Spoiler alert: It will even have color pictures!
  2. If and what the differences are between the Syba vacuum and the PolyScience Smoking Gun.  Spoiler alert: There are differences!
  3. Is it worth all of this effort?  Spoiler alert: Just kidding!

Jelloware: Edible Agar Agar Cups (SquishyCups)

Squishycups! Cite: TheWayWeSeeTheWorld
Such a simple and clever idea.  Agar Agar is a hydrocolloid derived from a sea algae, making it vegan.  It has all kinds of great culinary purposes, and now we can add another one.

Many great applications ahead for the use of edible, flavored cups... if they aren't too squishy or slimy.

Would this work for cocktails?  Pour some Patron into a margarita shot glass.  Tomato glass with horseradish infused vodka?  Think that's gross? No worries, it is also biodegradable/compostable.

Escolar: The World's Most Dangerous Fish

Escolar is the most controversial fish that you are likely to find in your fish market. This firm, white fleshed fish has an incredibly rich flavor, often described as 'succulent', or a fattier version of swordfish. Why so rich? It turns out that Escolar's diet contains food high in wax esters. Wax esters that are really difficult for Escolar to digest. As a result, these esters build up in the fish.

Where is the controversy in a buttery, delicious fish? I would say it is in the laxative like effect it has on a certain percentage of the population. Well, a 'laxative like effect' is how my fish monger described it. Others would describe it as closer to diahhrea. An expert would call it 'keriorrhoea'. Literally translated, it means 'flow of wax'. Oily orange droplets pouring out your pooper.  Keriorrhoea occurs because the wax esters in the flesh of the fish pool up in your intestine.

Some reports of Escolar related illness include cramping, nausea, diarrhea, the itis, and other abdominal pains.  This could be the result of severe Keriorrhea or could also be Scrombroid poisoning.  Escolar related Scromboid (or histimine poisoning) is the result of high levels of histidine being converted to histimine usually as a result of poor storage.

Hong Kong Protest Over Oilfish Sale.
Why would you eat a fish that has such terrible downsides? Two reasons:
  1. Escolar is delicious. Most likely, the same fatty ester in Escolar that makes you sick also makes it taste so damned good.
  2. Taste the danger! If you enjoy a sense of dining adventure, then consider Escolar the log flume of the culinary world.

CROUCHING ESCOLAR, HIDDEN OILFISH
Apart from all of the poop jokes I wanted to make, what really inspired me to write about Escolar is the lack of credible information on the subject.  The Canadian Food Inspection Agency suggests grilling, while Queensland's Health Agency states that cooking method does not matter.  It is really confusing because not only is Escolar sold under other names, but other fish are sometimes mislabeled as Escolar.  Doing some quick google searches, I created the following chart based on all of the references to escolar and oilfish being sold as other fish.  The most common form of Escolar trickery is to be found at your local sushi bar.  Any place selling white tuna or 'super white tuna' is more likely than not selling you Escolar.  White Tuna can technically be either Albacore Tuna or Escolar.  Albacore looks like pale tuna, while Escolar looks strikingly white.

This isn't confusing at all...
There are a number of reasons for this confusion.  Mostly, it is because suppliers and restaurants mislabel fish, either out of ignorance or fraud.  Another reason for the confusion is that Gempylidae, the family of fish that both Escolar and Oilfish belong to, has several other names.  According to Wikipedia, this family of fish is also called Escolars or Snake Mackerels. I have also seen at least one reference referring to Gempyldae as 'Oilfishes'. This means that the family name and the common species name can be the same.  There is also a segment of the population that thinks they were served Oilfish instead of Escolar, and that is what made them sick.  However, I haven't seen much scientific literature to back that up.  Both fish seem to have about equal chances of making you ill.


HOW NOT TO CRAP YOUR PANTS
So I have a couple of quick tips to reduce the likelihood of getting sick from Escolar.  It is mostly gleaned from the Internet, but the most credible source I found was an excerpt of Nick Ruello's Report On The Oil Content, Composition, And The Consumption Of Escolar.
  1. Limit Quantity. Obviously, less is more when it comes to Escolar. Conventional wisdom suggests no more than a six (6) ounce portion. I suggest an even smaller amount the first time you try it.
  2. Tail portion. While oil distribution varies per fish, the cuts near the tail generally have lower ester count.
  3. Cooking Methods. Don't appear to make a difference. There are some sources that claim grilling will reduce the wax esters but there is at least one scientific report that found this to be untrue.  Wax esters are heat stable, so the only potential benefit of grilling is that they somehow leak out of the fish.  This can also be achieved by baking the fish on a rack causing the juices, which may or may not contain wax esters to drip into the pan below.
  4. Deep Skinning. With certain fish, this oil resides just under the skin of the fish. By removing the flesh close to the skin, you can reduce the amount of wax ester. While it is recommended to do remove the skin because of its high oil count, there isn't much evidence that deep skinning will help much.  
  5. Freezing.  also does not work.  Wax esters are not damaged by cold, even after extended stays in the freezer.
  6. Fishmonger Trust. Since there are other fish that also contain high level of wax ester, it is best to go to a reputable fishmonger.  Also, Escolar has some other toxins that can result in histimine poisoning if the fish isn't stored properly.  
  7. Pre-Existing Conditions. As always, pregnant women have no fun. Also, people with malabsorption or bowel problems should probably just stay away. Unless you find your bathroom comfortable and you dislike your pants.  
TOO LATE, THE KERI IS O-RRHOEAIN'
I followed most of the advice above the first (and only) time I prepared Escolar at home.  I still had ended up with my own British Petroleum style oil leak, endangering most of the local habitat, with several failed attempts to contain the spill.  If you find yourself in this situation:
  1. Well it depends. Actually, no it doesn't... wear Depends. 
  2. Replenish your bathroom reading materials. 
  3. Call in sick, or plan your day around proximity to the bathroom.
  4. Avoid Escolar in the future. The truth is, all you can really do is ride out keriorrhoea. It should only be a couple of days.  
Finally, if you developed a case of Keriorrhoea and you didn't knowingly order Escolar, then you should  think back the the last time you ate a piece of a mysteriously delicious white fish, and give them a piece of your mind... or a stool sample.

NOTA MALE
By now it has occurred to you, that sharing a name with this fish is terrible.  And this is true.  But there is some serendipity between the fish and the author.  We are both simultaneously fatty, delicious, and will likely make you sick to your stomach when we are over-consumed.

If you have had any experiences with Escolar or Oilfish, or found anything inaccurate in this post, leave me a comment.  

Fat Tuesday: Weighting For Godot

It has been several months since The Health Scare That Was Mostly In My Head.  This blessing in wolves' clothing was the final push necessary to affect change. The good news is that the time it is taking to lose weight is lightyears faster than the time it took to gain it.  The bad news is, I still have a ways to go.


I gained weight gradually.  Maybe, a pound or two a year.  


It's easy.  You just sit there.

The weight finds you.

Every couple of years, my pants would go from fitting well, to getting tight, to fitting well again, to not fitting.  It wasn't till the second time it happened that I realized the fitting well again stage was just my waistline moving south.


The secret to my success is not rocket science.  I do the following:
  1. Exercise:  Not even that much.  I try to go 2-3x a week for 30 minutes.
  2. Eat More Good Stuff:  Salads.  Chicken.  Fish.  
  3. Eat Less Bad Stuff: Red Meat.  Pork.  Fat.  Pork Fat.  
  4. Eat Out Less:  For me, restaurants means fatfuckery.  I order more to hit delivery minimums, and I order poorly.  Also, at restaurants, I get an extra course and I tend to eat bread and butter.
  5. Eat Less: A corollary to #4, eating at home means smaller amounts of food.
Three months ago,  I was surfing the line between obese and morbidly obese.  Today, I am fucking thrilled to report that I am surfing the line between overweight and obese.

The weight loss will hopefully continue and I will be surfing the line between average and overweight.  If it continues past that, I'll be between average and underweight.  If it continues past that, don't just stand there, give me a foie gras donut topped with bacon.

Fu-uck m-e.